U.S.-EU trade deal includes ceiling for European pharmaceutical imports
The European Union has escaped a potential 250% pharmaceutical tariff and instead has secured a maximum 15% levy with the U.S. according to a joint statement released by both parties Thursday.
The U.S. and EU unveiled a high-level tariff blueprint Thursday, the first public, written expression of a plan they largely agreed to in July. Included within the terms is the elimination of an EU tariff on American industrial products, a stipulation to lower tariffs on many agricultural goods, a reduced tariff of a maximum 15% on European cars, and a 15% cap on semiconductor, lumber and pharmaceutical imports from the EU.
The 15% ceiling on pharmaceutical tariffs is a welcome reprieve from a phased increase of up to 250% in the coming years – something President Donald Trump mentioned in an interview with CNBC earlier this month.
“We’ll be putting initially a small tariff on pharmaceuticals, but in one year – one and a half years maximum – it’s going to go to 150% and then it’s going to go to 250%, because we want pharmaceuticals made in our country,” Trump had said.
Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick celebrated the agreement on X, formerly Twitter.
“The America First Trade Agenda has secured the most important trading partner creating a major win for American workers, U.S. industries, and our national security. Tariffs should be one of America’s favorite words,” Lutnick wrote.
The 27-nation EU is the largest supplier of many goods to the U.S. and the two enjoy “the world’s largest bilateral trade and investment relationship” and the “most integrated economic relationship in the world,” according to the European Commission. The agreement aims to correct “trade imbalances” the president has said exist between the U.S. and nearly all of its trading partners.
The joint statement “reflects acknowledgement by the European Union of the concerns of the United States and our joint determination to resolve our trade imbalances and unleash the full potential of our combined economic power.”
The Trump administration has promised to make pharmaceutical drugs cheaper for Americans and has taken several steps it believes will achieve that goal. In May, it announced that it would “equalize” what the U.S. pays for pharmaceutical drugs with its economic peers with an executive order aimed at securing “most favored nation” pricing for the U.S.
The president also issued another executive order to enhance the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program, and he wrote letters to some of the world’s biggest drug companies threatening government action if they did not lower some of their prices. Part of the president’s goal in exacting higher tariffs is that it would motivate countries to move or expand their business to the U.S. to avoid them.
While not legally binding, Thursday’s statement is intended to be a “first step in a process that can be further expanded over time to cover additional areas and continue to improve market access and increase their trade and investment relationship.”
According to Alex Durante, a senior economist at the Tax Foundation, the EU supplies about 61% of America’s pharmaceutical drugs. Switzerland, Singapore and India follow but supply significantly less – 9%, 8% and 6%, respectively.
Latest News Stories
First lawsuit filed against Camp Mystic by parents of five campers, two counselors
Senate votes to reopen government, sending funding bills to House
Illinois quick hits: Bailey to stay in governor’s race
Airlines warn flight reductions could cost U.S. economy
Report: Less than half of CPS students performing at grade level
WATCH: IL comptroller candidates focus on transparency, timely reporting
With shutdown ending, debate on Obamacare subsidies to begin
Democratic senators under fire explain why they supported GOP bill to end shutdown
FDA to remove ‘black box’ warnings on menopausal hormone therapies
Giannoulias ramps up campaign for state regulation of auto premiums
Trump demands air traffic controllers return to work
Analysis: Trump’s proposed tariff rebate would cost twice as much as tariffs