Immigration advocates sue Trump administration over ‘unlawful’ ICE arrests
A coalition of immigrants rights advocacy organizations filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration over its immigration enforcement in Washington, D.C.
The advocacy organizations, which includes CASA and the American Civil Liberties Union of the District of Columbia, filed petitions representing four plaintiffs in Washington, D.C. to stop the government from conducting “unlawful” arrests against them and any other individual in the future.
The lawsuit is challenging the administration’s authority to arrest people “without a warrant and without probable cause of unlawful immigration status and flight risk.”
The Immigration and Nationality Act authorizes ICE agents to arrest without a warrant any individual they reasonably believe to be in the country illegally, but only if that individual is in a public place.
ICE can establish reasonable belief to make an arrest through immigration records, criminal records and tips or leads.
“The government’s policy and practice of arresting people without probable cause are illegal and have disrupted everyday life in the District,” said Aditi Shah, staff attorney with the ACLU of the District of Columbia.
In August, President Donald Trump declared a “crime emergency” in Washington, D.C., which led to an increase in national guard and federal agent deployments, including ICE agents, according to the immigration advocacy organizations.
In a Friday news conference, one plaintiff in the lawsuit, who identified under an alias, recalled ICE agents and other police officers arresting him at his worksite in Washington, D.C. without a warrant or explaining their reasoning.
He said he was transferred to multiple detention facilities before being deported to his home country of El Salvador roughly 10 days later without seeing a lawyer or appearing before a judge.
“These arrests involve a protracted process of depriving someone of their liberty,” Shah said.
Although Trump’s 30-day order federalizing the Metropolitan Police Department expired, advocates said nothing is stopping the federal government from deploying agents in D.C.
“We have many accounts of arrests since the federal takeover ostensibly expired around September 11,” said Austin Rose, managing attorney at the Amica Center for Immigrant Rights. “The problem is continuing. People are still being arrested without warrants and without an individualized assessment and probable cause that they are unlawfully present.”
Rose said the Amica Center is directly in contact with “at least” 20 more people who have been affected by immigration enforcement in Washington, D.C.
The lawsuit seeks to find it unlawful for ICE agents to make arrests without providing warrants or probable cause.
The Supreme Court recently lifted a federal judge’s order in Los Angeles that prevented ICE from making arrests without probable cause. The high court’s ruling appears to provide a bleak outlook for the success of this lawsuit.
Madeline Gates, associate counsel at the Washington Lawyers’ Committee, said federal agents are required to either have a warrant or make “specific individualized probable cause determinations” before making an arrest.
“No arrest quotas or political agendas give federal agents the ability to ignore federal law,” Gates said.
Latest News Stories
EXCLUSIVE: First Nation police chiefs want to participate in border security efforts
Justice Department sues Fulton County over election records
USPS electric fleet push sparks cost, security and job concerns
WATCH: Use of Guard debated; Trump singles out Pritzker on AI; Property tax ruling
Illinois quick hits: Chicago Fed president explains vote; Treasurer encourages Bright Start gifts
EXCLUSIVE: Canadian groups, First Nation police support stronger border security
More than 9,500 commercial truckers taken off U.S. roads nationwide
WATCH: ‘Unfortunate accident’: Miss. senator blasted for comment on Guard troop shootings
WATCH: House Homeland Security hearing filled with tense exchanges
Judge rules against Trump’s freeze on wind energy
Illinois’ new paint fee takes effect, with critics calling it another burden on taxpayers
Pritzker decision looms for energy bill ‘on ratepayers’ backs’
WATCH: Use of National Guard debated in U.S. Senate as Illinois case lingers