Trade deal between Canada, U.S. will likely require more time
President Donald Trump hosted Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney at the White House Tuesday for the second time but was reluctant to say the meeting would result in a trade deal.
When asked whether Canada would leave Washington “empty-handed,” Trump suggested they would be pleased with Tuesday’s negotiations without specifically mentioning a deal.
“I think they’re going to walk away very happy. I think so,” the president said.
Though the U.S. has negotiated deals with several other countries, it had not yet reached an agreement with its neighbor to the north heading into Tuesday’s meeting. Carney left the White House in the mid-afternoon without responding to questions from journalists about how the meeting went, according to reports.
Currently, there’s a 35% tariff on most Canadian goods not covered under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, a trade agreement the previous Trump administration had negotiated that preserved free trade (or tariff-free trade) among the three countries on most goods.
In March, Trump imposed broad 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico, claiming their lack of border enforcement was contributing to America’s problems with illegal immigration and drug trafficking. He later added imported cars to the items tariffed at 25%. In August, the Republican raised tariffs to 35%, saying that Canada had not done enough to suppress fentanyl trafficking.
On Tuesday, Trump appeared satisfied with Canada’s efforts in that regard.
“Canada’s worked hard, and they’ve done a much better job than in the past. We have very few people coming in through our southern border too. We’ve worked with Canada and we’ve worked with Mexico, so we’ve made it a lot better,” Trump said.
The U.S. also levies a 50% tariff on Canadian steel and aluminum and will charge a 45% customs duty on Canadian lumber starting Oct. 14.
Despite Canada’s progress on the border, there are “natural conflicts” between the two countries simply due to their proximity, according to Trump, that make it harder to reach a sustainable agreement.
“Well, it’s a complicated agreement, more complicated maybe than any other agreement we have on trade, because, you know, we have natural conflict,” Trump said. “The problem we have is that they want a car company, and I want a car company… They want steel, and we want steel.”
Trump added that while other countries were “very far away,” Canada’s geographic closeness to the U.S. means they’re more likely to compete economically – but both want to avoid competing as much as possible.
“We don’t like to compete because we sort of hurt each other when we compete,” the president said.
Trump did indicate that there would be at least some tariffs in the final agreement between the U.S. and Canada, but that the U.S. would treat Canada “fairly” – likely meaning that he won’t allow the U.S. to be “ripped off” by Canadian trade policies but perhaps that America won’t demand exorbitant tariffs.
“We’re going to especially treat Canada fairly,” Trump said. “All we do now is fairness, but fairness leads us to the most successful country there’s ever been.”
Latest News Stories
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Casey-Westfield School Board for October 20, 2025
A Taste of 4-H: A Fun Challenge for Third Graders
Judge: Benefits of feeding babies beat risk claims in NEC lawsuits
Illinois quick hits: Raoul joins SNAP benefits lawsuit; disaster declaration denial appealed
WATCH: Democratic attorneys general sue feds to release food benefits
WATCH: GOP lawmaker: Pritzker-back energy omnibus will lead to higher bills
Illegal border crossings in September historically low
Vance says U.S. troops will get paid Friday despite shutdown
WATCH: Constitution debated as IL judge orders reports from Border Patrol commander
WATCH: Tax increases expected before Illinois legislators adjourn veto session
‘There is no excuse’: air traffic controllers, pilots urge Congress to end shutdown
Texas leaders look to immigration reform
IL state rep: Reckless immigration policies led to fatal crash
WATCH: Primary election petitions filed; redistricting consideration for veto session