MIT rejects White House education demands
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology refused to sign the White House agreement that would grant federal funds linked to the administration’s demands.
The Trump administration proposed a “Compact for Academic Excellence in Higher Education” to nine universities. The agreement offers special access to federal funding in exchange for commitments to eliminate racial discrimination in admissions and freeze tuition rates for the next five years, among other things.
The nine universities include: Brown University, the University of Pennsylvania, Dartmouth College, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Vanderbilt University, the University of Southern California, the University of Texas at Austin, the University of Virginia and the University of Arizona.
The compact states the universities are not required to sign the document, but would lose federal grants if they didn’t.
MIT is the first university to refuse the demands. In a letter to the Education Secretary Linda McMahon, MIT President Sally Kornbluth announced the decision.
“In our view, America’s leadership in science and innovation depends on independent thinking and open competition for excellence,” Kornbluth said. “In that free marketplace of ideas, the people of MIT gladly compete with the very best, without preferences. Therefore, with respect, we cannot support the proposed approach to addressing the issues facing higher education.”
MIT will continue to support freedom of expression, the MIT president added.
“We must hear facts and opinions we don’t like — and engage respectfully with those with whom we disagree,” Kornbluth wrote.
The American Association of University Professors is urging colleges to reject the proposed compact. Ariel White, vice president of MIT’s AAUP chapter, emphasized that universities should follow MIT’s lead and refuse to sign.
“The goal is to leave universities powerless and at the whim of the federal government and of the president personally and to make sure that universities cannot provide any sort of opposition to or simple disagreement with this administration,” White said. “Even if some individual parts of this deal sound OK to you now, you should not sign because it will not end there.”
Latest News Stories
Some blame taxes as Illinois grows on paper but loses residents
Illinois quick hits: Cannabis company sued for alleged sexual harassment; Reparations class action suit to proceed; Disaster declaration approved for August 2025 storms
Clark County Approves Highway Engineering Agreements, Discusses Infrastructure Upgrades
Helm’s Two-Way Masterpiece Leads Champaign Central Past Casey-Westfield 3-0
Champaign Central’s Early Surge Stuns Casey-Westfield in 3-0 Shutout
Casey-Westfield Powers Past Farina South Central 11-4 in Tournament Play
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Casey-Westfield School Board for March 16, 2026
Sullivan Holds Off Late Casey-Westfield Rally to Secure 5-4 Victory
Darin Patrick Appointed to Clark County Board Following Passing of Jim Bolin
Casey-Westfield Track Teams Sweep Titles with Dominant Showings at Stewardson-Strasburg
Martinsville School Board Approves Sweeping ‘Press Plus’ Policy Revisions, Seeks Lawn Care Bids
Casey-Westfield Explodes for Seven Runs in Sixth Inning to Defeat Waltonville 8-2
Teutopolis Cruises Past Casey-Westfield 10-0 Behind Massive Second Inning