MIT rejects White House education demands
The Massachusetts Institute of Technology refused to sign the White House agreement that would grant federal funds linked to the administration’s demands.
The Trump administration proposed a “Compact for Academic Excellence in Higher Education” to nine universities. The agreement offers special access to federal funding in exchange for commitments to eliminate racial discrimination in admissions and freeze tuition rates for the next five years, among other things.
The nine universities include: Brown University, the University of Pennsylvania, Dartmouth College, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Vanderbilt University, the University of Southern California, the University of Texas at Austin, the University of Virginia and the University of Arizona.
The compact states the universities are not required to sign the document, but would lose federal grants if they didn’t.
MIT is the first university to refuse the demands. In a letter to the Education Secretary Linda McMahon, MIT President Sally Kornbluth announced the decision.
“In our view, America’s leadership in science and innovation depends on independent thinking and open competition for excellence,” Kornbluth said. “In that free marketplace of ideas, the people of MIT gladly compete with the very best, without preferences. Therefore, with respect, we cannot support the proposed approach to addressing the issues facing higher education.”
MIT will continue to support freedom of expression, the MIT president added.
“We must hear facts and opinions we don’t like — and engage respectfully with those with whom we disagree,” Kornbluth wrote.
The American Association of University Professors is urging colleges to reject the proposed compact. Ariel White, vice president of MIT’s AAUP chapter, emphasized that universities should follow MIT’s lead and refuse to sign.
“The goal is to leave universities powerless and at the whim of the federal government and of the president personally and to make sure that universities cannot provide any sort of opposition to or simple disagreement with this administration,” White said. “Even if some individual parts of this deal sound OK to you now, you should not sign because it will not end there.”
Latest News Stories
WATCH: Hegseth: U.S., Israel will soon have ‘complete control’ over Iran’s airspace
Do No Harm claims racial discrimination in civil rights complaints against 2 health groups
Clark County Bans Kratom Sales in Unincorporated Areas
Senate Judiciary confronts rise in child trafficking and sextortion
WATCH: Gov. Ferguson signaling income tax bill may be dead for session
Lawmakers consider SNAP, other amendments to 2026 farm bill
Los Angeles school board borrows $250M for settlements
WATCH/EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEWS: California Voter ID measure gets over 1 million signatures
As fighting intensifies overseas, Republicans push harder to get DHS funded
Reported debt deal, credit downgrades may add to Chicago budget woes
State financial officers protect, recover $28B in tax dollars in 2025
Iran war, Saudi outage to boost U.S. propane, butane exports