Clark County Hires Legal Experts to Strengthen Solar Farm Ordinances Amid Citizen Concerns
Clark County Board Meeting | October 10, 2025
Article Summary:
The Clark County Board has decided to hire the law firm Heyl Royster to help draft and improve county ordinances related to solar energy projects. The move comes as the board and residents continue to voice concerns over decommissioning plans, environmental protections, and permit enforcement for renewable energy developments.
Solar Ordinance Key Points:
-
Expert Counsel Hired: The board agreed to have the State’s Attorney’s office retain attorney Andrew Keyt of Heyl Royster, a firm representing 26 Illinois counties on renewable energy ordinances.
-
Scope of Work: The firm will assist with drafting new ordinances and finalizing requirements for solar projects that have already passed the initial Special Use Permit phase.
-
Citizen Input: The decision followed public comments from resident Bill Cornwell, who urged the board to demand detailed decommissioning plans, protect water sources, and include clauses to revoke permits if projects underperform.
Responding to ongoing public concerns about renewable energy development, the Clark County Board at a special meeting on Friday, October 10, 2025, unanimously agreed to hire specialized legal counsel to bolster its solar farm regulations.
The board met with Andrew Keyt, an attorney from the firm Heyl Royster, who explained his firm’s experience in helping approximately 26 Illinois counties navigate ordinances for solar, wind, and battery storage projects. Keyt noted that while the state has established certain “guardrails” that counties cannot deviate from, his firm works to make local ordinances as strong as possible within those legal boundaries.
Following a discussion where board members and the public asked numerous questions, the board reached a consensus to direct State’s Attorney Kyle Hutson to retain Heyl Royster. The firm will be tasked with assisting on future projects and helping to finalize the regulatory process for solar projects that have already received a Special Use Permit.
The board’s action was reinforced by public comments from resident Bill Cornwell, who referenced a letter he sent to the board in August. Cornwell highlighted the need for detailed, itemized decommissioning plans that include labor hours and prevailing wages. He also raised concerns about protecting potable water sources from runoff or damage during construction and suggested that the county should have the power to revoke a Special Use Permit if a solar farm fails to produce its promised amount of electricity.
Latest News Stories
WATCH: WA Democrat income tax supporter questions ‘necessity clause’ nixing public vote
DOJ to face audit for handling of Epstein files release
ISU strike enters third week; union sues over alleged strikebreaking
Trump extends Jones Act waiver, citing national securit
Trump admin continues to crack down on fraudulent visa schemes
Virginia 1 of 4 in courtroom battles for congressional redistricting
Mt. Carmel Offense Explodes Early in 12-4 Rout of Casey-Westfield
Goble Tosses Shutout, Casey-Westfield Outlasts Mt. Carmel 1-0 in Extra Innings
Illinois Quick Hits: State gaming board renew Rockford casino license
Arizona GOP pushes to protect Colorado River’s limited water
Republicans challenge Clyde in Georgia’s 9th District
Fort Bragg soldier’s case continues Tuesday in New York