Advocates urge stable tariff policy, protections against China
Advocates sparred Wednesday over the Trump administration’s trade and national security policy, particularly with concerns over China.
Advocates and experts gathered at the American Institute for Economic Research’s Trade, National Security and American Prosperity Conference Wednesday in Washington, D.C.
The groups debated the implementation of the Trump administration’s trade policies and their effect on national security. Most advocates argued for a greater reliance on free trade in the economic marketplace.
Michael Faulkender, former deputy secretary of the Treasury Department, called for the United States to build a comprehensive coalition of countries to counter China’s growing economic influence. He said the U.S. needs to enable cooperation with allies to encourage innovation and compete with China.
Derek Scissors, senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, agreed. He said the U.S. needs to engage in technological innovation at a greater scale to keep up with China.
Faulkender also called for a fundamental reform of the National Environmental Policy Act. The act requires federal agencies to assess and submit reports on the environmental effects of proposed actions before making decisions.
Gregg said overbearing regulations in the U.S. allow countries like China to get ahead. He urged a more relaxed approach to environmental regulations, alongside Faulkender.
“We’ve had some significant raw mineral discoveries in the United States over the past five years, but they’re still not up and running,” Gregg said. “Some of the problems we have have little to do with trade, they’re much more to do with things like excessive regulation.”
The advocates discussed whether to pursue economic and trade policies that regulate China or promote American growth. Faulkender said the U.S. can pursue both strategies.
Advocates at the conference also called for a free trade approach to economic policy. Samuel Gregg, president at the American Institute for Economic Research, said free trade is essential for America’s long-term economic interests and innovation.
“The more open a country’s economic orientation, the faster its economy grows, compared to nations with high trade barriers,” Gregg said.
He argued that allowing free trade to spur economic growth can help prevent military conflicts, allow the private sector to thrive and can help lower costs for those industries. Gregg said the U.S. does not need to sacrifice national security objectives in order to achieve freer trade goals.
“We shouldn’t think of freer trade as a luxury that America can only afford in peacetime,” Gregg said. “It’s capable of strengthening America’s economy, fortifying our alliances and helping to deter America’s adversaries.”
Latest News Stories
Elon Poll says 2 in 3 proud to be American and Signers would be disappointed
U.S. Supreme Court denies Florida request to sue over immigrant CDLs
Judge says federal rule blocks Illinois from banning ‘swipe fees’
Canadians, Brits stress U.S., Texas are key to shipbuilding
Tariff litigation expands as federal court weighs next move
Democrats dissatisfied by DOJ’s pause on ‘anti-weaponization fund’
Hegseth calls allied defense ‘bad deal for taxpayers’ in budget push
Pritzker touts state spending to cover federal cuts in passed budget
I-95 quintuple fatal: Federal agency subpoenas state of New York
Illinois lawmakers give raises to diversity commissioners they criticized
Report: Credit card debt projected to decrease $61B
Taxpayer risk cited after Bears stadium bill stalls