College funding bill draws dissent from big Illinois universities
(The Center Square) – Lawmakers questioned Illinois university leaders about a contentious bill that adjusts how new money is allocated to in-state, public universities.
The new funding formula would favor smaller schools with the least funding.
HB 1581, the “Adequate and Equitable Public University Funding Act,” proposes a yearly increase over 15 years of $135 million to state university funding, each public university getting a specific percentage, with priority given to universities that are the most in need.
University of Illinois system President Tim Killeen, whose schools are by-far the highest publicly funded in the state, expressed strong opposition to the bill and where current percentages would put their coming funding increases.
“There is no number that doesn’t, in a way, negatively affect the University of Illinois system,” Killeen said.
Nicholas Jones, executive vice president of the system, added that they would receive smaller increases to yearly funding than they have previously, which could force them to increase tuition costs and out-of-state admissions for new revenue.
“With the current allocation, University of Illinois receives about 51% of the total increase in appropriation. If the formula went into effect fully funded at $135 million, University of Illinois would get 28% of the appropriation,” Jones said.
Committee chair Sen. Michael Halpin, D-Galesburg, was highly critical of the university’s position.
“I think it’s informative to see what the University of Illinois thinks it needs this year and compare that to what the rest of our universities are asking for. Twenty percent of $135 million is about $28 million. That is almost half of Western Illinois’ annual operations budget,” said Halpin.
In a House committee hearing last week, bill sponsor Rep. Carol Ammons, D-Champaign, spoke about the funding formula bill, saying it is considering student needs, and that it would most benefit those students.
The bill passed the committee on the agreement Ammons would return to the house committee after negotiations and adjustments take place.
Among other state schools, support for the bill is unambiguous. The U of I system receives about 51% of new funds under the current system, so the new need-based system could mean a large shift in how and where a significant amount of state tax dollars are used.
In the Senate hearing, Western Illinois University President Dr. Kristi Mindrup spoke in favor of the bill, saying it would provide needed funding for all state schools, calling the current system arbitrary.
“WIU stands united with seven other public universities throughout the state in support of the legislation because additional funding strengthens education quality and affordability and strengthens local economies,” said Mindrup.
Northern Illinois University President Dr. Lisa Freeman also reflected her support, saying it would be a long-term solution to a major problem.
“Working together, we have an opportunity to increase attainment, uplift communities and strengthen the Illinois economy,” Freeman said. “That’s why NIU strongly supports adoption of the proposed higher education funding formula that addresses long-standing inequities in Illinois higher education funding system.”
Latest News Stories
First lawsuit filed against Camp Mystic by parents of five campers, two counselors
Senate votes to reopen government, sending funding bills to House
Illinois quick hits: Bailey to stay in governor’s race
Airlines warn flight reductions could cost U.S. economy
Report: Less than half of CPS students performing at grade level
WATCH: IL comptroller candidates focus on transparency, timely reporting
With shutdown ending, debate on Obamacare subsidies to begin
Democratic senators under fire explain why they supported GOP bill to end shutdown
FDA to remove ‘black box’ warnings on menopausal hormone therapies
Giannoulias ramps up campaign for state regulation of auto premiums
Trump demands air traffic controllers return to work
Analysis: Trump’s proposed tariff rebate would cost twice as much as tariffs