Illinois millionaire’s tax moves closer to November ballot
(The Center Square) – A measure giving Illinois voters the opportunity to consider a millionaire’s tax is one step closer to the November ballot.
House Joint Resolution Constitutional Amendment 21 would raise the tax rate on income more than $1 million from 4.95% to 7.95%.
State Rep. La Shawn Ford, D-Chicago, argued in favor of his resolution before the House Revenue and Finance Committee late Tuesday afternoon.
“This will make Illinois schools better. It will make Illinois stronger by making sure that we can invest in our schools and provide property tax relief to families,” Ford said.
Half the revenue collected from the millionaire’s tax would be used for property tax relief. The other half would go to public school districts on a per-pupil basis.
Illinois Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability data based on 2023 tax returns suggested that the millionaire’s tax would have generated $2.2 billion in revenue.
Taxpayers’ Federation of Illinois President Maurice Scholten said his organization does not oppose a graduated income tax, but it does oppose having a dollar amount in the state constitution.
“So it’ll be $1 million this year, next year, every year, and in 2045, 2065, more and more taxpayers will be hit by that. If the General Assembly feels that the right amount is $1 million, that should be indexed to inflation somehow,” Scholten said.
Scholten also said small business owners who sell could be hit by a “one-time income event.”
State Rep. Amy Elik, R-Alton, asked Ford how the tax would apply to couples.
“So you’re saying joint filers $1 million plus, so in that situation maybe they would file married filing separately to avoid the 3%?” Elik said.
“To maintain under the threshold, yes,” Ford said.
When state Rep. Kyle Moore, R-Quincy, asked why the resolution language did not specify how revenue from the tax would be distributed, Ford admitted there were no plans for allocation but the General Assembly would have that responsibility after voters approve the amendment.
“We don’t give our taxpayers, we don’t give the people of Illinois the credit that they deserve by thinking that they’re just dumb enough to think that this money’s going to be used for the proper purpose. It’s not, you know that,” state Rep. Steven Reick, R-Woodstock, said.
Ford suggested that he could work with Reick to put a lockbox in place to make sure the funds would be used appropriately.
The amendment passed out of committee with a partisan vote of 13-7 and now heads to the House floor.
If three fifths of the General Assembly approves HJRCA 21 by May 3, voters will decide the amendment’s fate Nov. 3.
Latest News Stories
Judge declines to immediately block Guard deployment in Illinois
WATCH: Judge blocks California National Guard in Portland
Shutdown having ‘ripple effect’ on U.S. airline systems, DOT says
Maryland Supreme Court appears skeptical of climate change lawsuit
Broadview limits ‘aggressive’ ICE protesters time; Chicago makes ‘ICE free zone’
Trump set to talk trade with Canada in Tuesday meeting
Illinois GOP backs student privacy complaint against ISU
Illinois announces lawsuit against Trump admin for use of Guard
Illinois quick hits: Lawsuit filed over Guard deployment; 3 charged for using vehicles to impede ICE
Negotiations continue in Israel-Hamas peace deal
WATCH: Trump: Pritzker fears for his life as gov opposes Guard deployment; CTA DEI cuts
Op-Ed: Lawsuit Abuse Awareness Week: Time to protect Illinois jobs, family businesses