Federal appeals court halts access to mail-order abortion drug
A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily halted a Biden-era rule that allowed individuals to receive the abortion pill mifepristone through the mail without a prescription from a doctor.
A three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans ruled that the state of Louisiana likely would win its lawsuit challenging the practice.
“A three-judge panel on the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has stayed the Biden administration’s 2023 REMS nationwide,” a news release from the Office of the Louisiana Attorney General says. “This means that prescribers cannot lawfully mail abortion drugs into Louisiana. The in-person dispensing of mifepristone is again required while the litigation proceeds.”
Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill sued after the Biden administration’s Food and Drug Administration altered its safety guidelines and allowed mifepristone. to be prescribed online and dispensed through the mail, without needing an in-person doctor’s visit.
The FDA’s move came after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe V. Wade in its decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health, which essentially returned the regulation of abortion back to the states.
Latest News Stories
Soaring costs and short supply shut millennials out of housing market
Vought testifies before lawmakers on Trump’s $2.1T budget request
SNAP eligibility changes spark debate on gap for impacted recipients
Trump puts spotlight on China, Iran’s top oil consumer
Lawmakers, auditors offer fraud prevention solutions
Illinois unions seek to kill Waymo-friendly bill in Springfield
Rich States Poor States: Tax policy largely determines states’ economic competitiveness
78 pro-life orgs ask DOJ to stop undermining state laws by favoring aborting drug industry
Illinois Quick Hits: Two of ComEd four released; new trial expected
Casey-Westfield Launches Seven Home Runs in 18-4 Rout of Tri-County
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Casey City Council for April 6, 2026
Chicago suit vs oil cos. may yet survive SCOTUS ruling, judge hints