Supreme Court allows mail-order abortion drugs
The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that women can continue to access abortion drugs through the mail without making an in-person doctor’s visit, while a lawsuit continues against the practice.
Justices on the high court graned two emergency requests from Danco Laboratories and GenProBio, two makers of the abortion drug mifepristone.
The manufacturers challenged a ruling in Lousiana that upheld the state’s ban on prescribing abortion drugs without an in-person doctor’s visit. In 2023, the Biden administration finalized a rule to allow the drugs to be obtained without an in-person visit.
Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented from the majority’s decision. Alito said the litigation limits a state’s ability to make determinations on abortion, as granted in the high court’s 2022 decision that overturned the constitutional right to abortion.
“Louisiana’s efforts have been thwarted by certain medical providers, private organizations, and States that abhor laws like Louisiana’s and seek to undermine their enforcement,” Alito wrote.
Thomas said allowing abortion drugs to be prescribed without an in-person doctors visit is a crime.
“[Danco Laboratories] cannot, in any legally relevant sense, be irreparably harmed by a court order that makes it more difficult for them to commit crimes,” Thomas wrote in his dissent.
In 2023, approximately two-thirds of all abortions in the United States were through medications.
Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America’s President Marjorie Dannenfelser said she was “disappointed” with the decision.
“We are deeply disappointed the Supreme Court will not respond to the harm occurring nationwide with mercy and stop the dangerous mail-order abortion drug regime,” Dannenfelser said in a statement provided to The Center Square. “Today’s decision does not touch the merits of the case as it returns to the 5th Circuit. The reality is clear: The mail-order abortion drug experiment has failed countless women. Across red and blue states alike, women who never wanted to abort their babies have been coerced and poisoned because of the lack of oversight. By the FDA’s admission, the research never supported removing in-person doctor visits, and Secretary Kennedy himself testified that the Biden administration twisted the data.”
As the case plays out, access to the abortion drug is expected to be uninterrupted until into next year. The high court could be petitioned again to rule on the merits of the lawsuit after litigation begins.
Latest News Stories
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Casey-Westfield School Board for October 20, 2025
A Taste of 4-H: A Fun Challenge for Third Graders
Judge: Benefits of feeding babies beat risk claims in NEC lawsuits
Illinois quick hits: Raoul joins SNAP benefits lawsuit; disaster declaration denial appealed
WATCH: Democratic attorneys general sue feds to release food benefits
WATCH: GOP lawmaker: Pritzker-back energy omnibus will lead to higher bills
Illegal border crossings in September historically low
Vance says U.S. troops will get paid Friday despite shutdown
WATCH: Constitution debated as IL judge orders reports from Border Patrol commander
WATCH: Tax increases expected before Illinois legislators adjourn veto session
‘There is no excuse’: air traffic controllers, pilots urge Congress to end shutdown
Texas leaders look to immigration reform
IL state rep: Reckless immigration policies led to fatal crash
WATCH: Primary election petitions filed; redistricting consideration for veto session