Trump confirms Nvidia chip agreement
Nvidia will pay the United States 15% of the money it makes from selling artificial intelligence chips to China, President Donald Trump said in a press conference on Monday.
Trump said he allowed Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang to sell H20 chips to China while the company provides the U.S. government with a kickback of the profits.
“The H20 is obsolete,” Trump said. “So we negotiate a little deal so he’s, essentially, selling an old chip,” Trump added, referring to Huang.
Trump said he initially asked for a 20% cut from sales of Nvidia’s chips but the two landed on 15%.
In April, Trump banned Nvidia from selling H20 chips to China. The administration later reversed the ban in July.
A coalition of democratic lawmakers, including Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., criticized the administration’s July reversal.
“Limiting the PRC’s access to advanced compute has been a focus of Congress: one with a strong bipartisan commitment across both chambers and both parties,” The letter read.
“The PRC’s development of advanced AI capabilities represents a clear risk to the United States’ national and economic security, and the administration’s willingness to trade away that security is extremely troubling,” the letter continued.
Latest News Stories
Trump calls for Pritzker, Johnson to be jailed
Religious rights don’t trump IL’s authority to force abortion coverage
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Clark County Board for August 15, 2025
FBI ‘Summer Heat’ arrests include ‘Most Wanted’ fugitives, gang members
WATCH: Pritzker blasts Trump, Illinois GOP leaders at Minneapolis event
Illinois quick hits: Pritzker condemns $2.1 billion CTA freeze; nuclear energy firm plans research facility
Unions sue Trump over 100k H-1B visa fee
Trade deal between Canada, U.S. will likely require more time
Billions in GDP lost during first week of government shutdown, Johnson says
Trump to hit imported heavy trucks with 25% tariff starting Nov. 1
Supreme Court appears skeptical of Colorado conversion therapy ban
Freedom of the press? Not according to DC appellate court