Report: Congress authorized $15 trillion in ’emergency’ deficit spending since 1991
Over the past 35 years, Congress has used emergency funding rules to bypass budget controls and spend a cumulative $15 trillion, a new analysis reveals.
That sum, financed almost entirely through deficit spending, roughly equals the money spent on Medicaid and veterans programs combined from 1991 to 2025.
“What happens when there’s an emergency, because there’s so little oversight of this process, everyone will get their little piece of the pie, and [lawmakers] will add things that don’t need emergency funding,” Dominick Lett, a Cato Institute budget policy analyst and author of the report, told The Center Square. “That leads to waste and further weakens the U.S.”
On paper, there are measures in place meant to prevent Congress from overspending. Federal budget rules like PAYGO require that Congress offset increases in mandatory spending – that is, automatically renewed spending on mandated programs like Social Security – by deficit reduction measures.
Other laws, such as the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023, placed caps on discretionary spending, which is renewed annually and funds government programs.
But these controls contain exemptions for emergency spending. And though the Budget Control Act of 2011 mandates that emergency spending provisions must be “necessary, sudden, urgent, unforeseen, and not permanent,” the lack of standardized evaluations means lawmakers can classify nearly anything as “emergency” spending.
As a result, Congress has used this loophole to authorize $12.5 trillion in outlays since 1991, incurring $2.5 trillion in additional interest costs, when adjusted for inflation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, Congress authorized hundreds of millions in non-emergency spending through emergency funding bills, Lett found. Examples include $70 million for tourism marketing campaigns in Puerto Rico, $12 million to renovate a New York baseball stadium, and $6.6 million for irrigation systems at two Colorado golf courses.
“This isn’t a question of whether or not we should be spending money on that or not,” Lett said. “It’s just that [lawmakers] use the process to get around budget rules, and that obviously adds to the debt.”
The national debt topped $37 trillion earlier this year, with the U.S. government racking up a $1.8 trillion deficit in fiscal year 2024 alone.
Some Republicans want to reduce deficit spending – particularly through health care entitlement program reform – using the annual appropriations process. Other Republicans are wary of voting for more spending cuts in any future legislation, and Democrats have vehemently opposed any funding plan that omits boosts to health care funding.
Lett, however, said there are plenty of ways Republicans can control deficit spending, which he includes in his report.
“There is an enormous amount of spending for a variety of programs that Americans have never even heard of,” Lett told The Center Square. “So I think there’s lots of opportunities for Republicans to cut spending further, without committing political suicide. Whether or not that will happen, I think, is a different matter.”
Latest News Stories
EXCLUSIVE: First Nation police chiefs want to participate in border security efforts
Justice Department sues Fulton County over election records
USPS electric fleet push sparks cost, security and job concerns
WATCH: Use of Guard debated; Trump singles out Pritzker on AI; Property tax ruling
Illinois quick hits: Chicago Fed president explains vote; Treasurer encourages Bright Start gifts
EXCLUSIVE: Canadian groups, First Nation police support stronger border security
More than 9,500 commercial truckers taken off U.S. roads nationwide
WATCH: ‘Unfortunate accident’: Miss. senator blasted for comment on Guard troop shootings
WATCH: House Homeland Security hearing filled with tense exchanges
Judge rules against Trump’s freeze on wind energy
Illinois’ new paint fee takes effect, with critics calling it another burden on taxpayers
Pritzker decision looms for energy bill ‘on ratepayers’ backs’
WATCH: Use of National Guard debated in U.S. Senate as Illinois case lingers