Appeals judge questions ‘uphill battle’ for IL gun ban found unconstitutional
(The Center Square) – A three judge panel in a federal appeals took the challenge to Illinois’ gun and magazine ban under advisement after hearing arguments Monday.
Southern District of Illinois Judge Stephen McGlynn found the law unconstitutional last year on final judgement. Monday, the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals heard oral arguments. Judge Michael Brennan praised McGlynn’s opinion’s thoroughness
“I think this is the first time we’ve had a full trial record of any federal appellate court in the country, set a full trial record,” Brennan said. “Isn’t that an uphill battle for the state to overcome those findings?”
Brennan sided with plaintiffs when the case was in front of the appeals court in 2023.
Judge Frank Easterbrook, who joined now retired Judge Diane Wood in siding with the state on preliminary grounds last year, said the district court didn’t address the rate of fire and capacity of magazines as the appeals court had directed.
“I really worry about the blah blah blah, etc. etc. given that the district court didn’t make findings on several of the things we told it, it needed to,” Easterbrook said Monday.
The state, working to defend the law, said there are unprecedented societal concerns of mass shootings. Brennan questioned that.
“If it’s a mass shooting circumstance, I’m not sure. We can’t be myopic in our history with regard to when these, these, mass shootings occurred,” Brennan said. “It’s not just recent. It’s going back.”
Judge Amy St Eve asked challenging questions of both plaintiffs and defendants.
Speaking for plaintiffs challenging the law, Assistant U.S. Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon said Illinois’ law is at odds with the U.S. Supreme Court.
“The United States has a strong interest in ensuring that the Second Amendment is not relegated to a second class right, and that all the law-abiding citizens of the circuit remain able to enjoy the full exercise of their Second Amendment rights,” Dhillon said.
It’s unclear when the appeals panel would rule on the case. Either way the three-judge panel goes, the case is expected to go to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Latest News Stories
EXCLUSIVE: Funding for green groups soared after 2009 endangerment finding, nonprofit finds
Comfort in the Hill Country: Crosses that point to Jesus, salvation, redemption
Tech company wants federal government to reimagine training, hiring
What are data centers and why do they matter?
Richard Livingston Dunn, 87
Advocates look to state-based immigration programs
Erika Kirk: ‘The cries of this widow will echo around the world like a battlecry’
Routh trial gets a taste of Vienna sausages as it speeds along
Illinois quick hits: Migrant dead after incident with ICE; Pritzker signs vaccine access executive order
Damning report card: California schools get an ‘F’
Kirk assassination suspect ‘confessed’ or ‘indicated’ crime to family member
Lawmakers, advocates call for change after reading and math scores disappoint
Migrant dead, ICE officer injured after Illinois incident
House approves criminal migrant prison extension bill