WATCH: Republican leader: says Pritzker budget cut EO a ploy for IL tax increases
(The Center Square) – Gov. J.B. Pritzker blames President Donald Trump for ordering Illinois state agencies to find 4% budget cuts. A Republican leader offers suggested cuts but warns the move is a smokescreen for tax increases.
Pritzker issued the budgeting executive order Tuesday.
“I’m taking executive action to mitigate the impact of Trump’s economic policies on our state finances, maintain critical services, and preserve our economic stability,” Pritzker said in a news release.
Pritzker’s office said the order will have state agencies conduct immediate budget reviews to identify efficiencies and reductions, identify up to 4% of General Funds appropriations for fiscal year 2026 reserves to reinforce state finances, limit non-essential spending, purchases and travel, review all hiring decisions and prioritize only essential roles and propose programmatic changes or appropriation transfers if fiscal 2026 budget shortfalls emerge.
At an unrelated event Tuesday, Pritzker blamed Trump for the state having to restrain spending.
“By the policies of the big ugly bill, the policies of his administration, there are hundreds of millions of dollars that are going to have to be made up for as a result of the cuts that he is making,” Pritzker said.
Pritzker said Trump administration cuts will hit Illinois as early as this year.
“And then, of course, going into FY27, there are going to be severe effects upon the state budget and that’s going to be yet another conversation,” Pritzker said.
Illinois House Minority Leader Tony McCombie, R-Savanna, gave Pritzker ideas where to cut.
“How about, let’s not spend $2.3 billion on health care for illegal immigrants,” McCombie told The Center Square. “That’s not even touching what we spend on the increase of costs in our schools or for housing or other wraparound programs that they are qualifying for.”
McCombie said Pritzker blaming Trump and not Democratic policies impacting the economy is a smokescreen for more tax increases.
“Whether it’s for transit, whether it’s for more pork projects and or, God forbid, the failing energy policies that continue to plague Illinois,” McCombie said.
Illinois Senate Minority Leader John Curran, R-Downers Gove, said the state needs to cut spending regardless of who’s president, and Pritzker should restrain spending, lower taxes and improve economic opportunity.
“When President Biden was in the White House, the Governor’s own five-year budget projections showed average annual budget deficits of $4.6 billion over the next five years,” Curran said in a statement. “Yet, he continued to increase state spending by 40% since taking office, despite Illinois’ GDP significantly lagging behind national growth.”
Curran said if Pritzker is serious about the state’s fiscal solvency, he would make “the difficult, and sometimes unpopular decisions needed to constrain state spending, reduce taxes, and improve economic opportunity for all Illinoisans, regardless of who is president.”
Records show discretionary spending by Illinois state leaders has increased more than $16 billion since Pritzker became governor nearly seven years ago.
Latest News Stories
Former Vice President Dick Cheney dies
Illinois quick hits: Ceremonies planned for new lawyers; energy efficiency grants announced
26 states participate in federal SAVE program to ensure only US citizens are voting
Key races across U.S., redistricting at stake as voters head to polls Tuesday
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Casey Township Library Board of Trustees for October 2, 2025
Nigeria leaders deny Christian genocide, UN attributes violence to ‘climate change’
Congressional Perks: House members, staff get daycare, on-call doctor
California leaders hope for high voter turnout for Prop. 50
Voters to decide two statewide measures, nearly 100 local proposals
WATCH: Coalition sues to protect student loan forgiveness
WATCH: California attorney general talks about Prop. 50
Illinois quick hits: Man charged with threatening Trump; judge grants injunction in shelter funding case