Cato scholar calls Trump’s Antifa executive order ‘idiotic’
A top Cato scholar said President Donald Trump’s move to designate Antifa a domestic terror organization was “idiotic.”
Patrick Eddington, a senior fellow in homeland security and civil liberties at the Cato Institute, said Trump’s executive order fell short.
“Yes, on the surface, the EO is idiotic on multiple levels,” he wrote. “The notion that an idea can be designated an organization is one. The fact that there’s no constitutional provision or statute granting any president the power to designate a domestic civil society organization a ‘domestic terrorist organization’ is another.”
Eddington also said the text of the executive order missed the mark.
“The EO’s declaration that ‘Antifa is a militarist, anarchist enterprise that explicitly calls for the overthrow of the United States Government, law enforcement authorities, and our system of law’ is more than false – it is designed to act as a justification for legal and coercive action against anyone or any entity that the regime designates as engaged in,” he wrote.
The White House cited “coordinated efforts” to “obstruct” federal law enforcement, specifically immigration enforcement operations through “organized riots” and “violent assaults,” including doxing.
The White House said the designation will allow law enforcement to use federal resources to investigate and “dismantle” “terrorist actions” attributed to the group or anyone “claiming to act on behalf” of the group. In addition, it will allow the federal government to investigate and prosecute those responsible for funding Antifa.
Eddington said the executive order goes too far.
“And none of those things matter, contrary to a lot of the legal or political commentary you may have already seen. What matters is that the administration asserts the authority to do this, and it has thousands of armed and armored federal law enforcement agents ready and able to carry out Trump’s orders – just as ICE and other federal agents (including mobilized National Guard troops) have been carrying out ‘immigration enforcement’ operations of dubious or no legality for months,” he wrote.
In a fact sheet released by the White House shortly after the designation, it listed several acts of violence attributed to Antifa, including a July ambush on an ICE facility in Alvarado, Texas, resulting in one officer being shot in the neck.
In May 2020, the Department of Justice “formally labeled Antifa violence as domestic terrorism.”
Eddington said it was enough to disturb the late novelist George Orwell.
“George Orwell, one of the most well-known antifascists of the last century, is undoubtedly rolling over in his grave right now,” Eddington wrote.
Domestic terrorism is defined in federal law as criminal acts occurring in the U.S. that either threaten human life, are intended to coerce or intimidate civilians or to influence government policy or action. However, domestic terrorism on its own is not a criminally chargeable offense. Congress has considered the possibility of new domestic terrorism laws, but concerns over constitutional rights have seemingly prevented lawmakers from doing so.
In a response to a question from The Center Square regarding Antifa, the president mentioned going after the group through the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO.
Latest News Stories
Hochul weighs AI regulations as Trump sets federal rules
EXCLUSIVE: First Nation police chiefs want to participate in border security efforts
Justice Department sues Fulton County over election records
USPS electric fleet push sparks cost, security and job concerns
WATCH: Use of Guard debated; Trump singles out Pritzker on AI; Property tax ruling
Illinois quick hits: Chicago Fed president explains vote; Treasurer encourages Bright Start gifts
EXCLUSIVE: Canadian groups, First Nation police support stronger border security
More than 9,500 commercial truckers taken off U.S. roads nationwide
WATCH: ‘Unfortunate accident’: Miss. senator blasted for comment on Guard troop shootings
WATCH: House Homeland Security hearing filled with tense exchanges
Judge rules against Trump’s freeze on wind energy
Illinois’ new paint fee takes effect, with critics calling it another burden on taxpayers
Pritzker decision looms for energy bill ‘on ratepayers’ backs’
WATCH: Use of National Guard debated in U.S. Senate as Illinois case lingers