Trade deal between Canada, U.S. will likely require more time
President Donald Trump hosted Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney at the White House Tuesday for the second time but was reluctant to say the meeting would result in a trade deal.
When asked whether Canada would leave Washington “empty-handed,” Trump suggested they would be pleased with Tuesday’s negotiations without specifically mentioning a deal.
“I think they’re going to walk away very happy. I think so,” the president said.
Though the U.S. has negotiated deals with several other countries, it had not yet reached an agreement with its neighbor to the north heading into Tuesday’s meeting. Carney left the White House in the mid-afternoon without responding to questions from journalists about how the meeting went, according to reports.
Currently, there’s a 35% tariff on most Canadian goods not covered under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, a trade agreement the previous Trump administration had negotiated that preserved free trade (or tariff-free trade) among the three countries on most goods.
In March, Trump imposed broad 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico, claiming their lack of border enforcement was contributing to America’s problems with illegal immigration and drug trafficking. He later added imported cars to the items tariffed at 25%. In August, the Republican raised tariffs to 35%, saying that Canada had not done enough to suppress fentanyl trafficking.
On Tuesday, Trump appeared satisfied with Canada’s efforts in that regard.
“Canada’s worked hard, and they’ve done a much better job than in the past. We have very few people coming in through our southern border too. We’ve worked with Canada and we’ve worked with Mexico, so we’ve made it a lot better,” Trump said.
The U.S. also levies a 50% tariff on Canadian steel and aluminum and will charge a 45% customs duty on Canadian lumber starting Oct. 14.
Despite Canada’s progress on the border, there are “natural conflicts” between the two countries simply due to their proximity, according to Trump, that make it harder to reach a sustainable agreement.
“Well, it’s a complicated agreement, more complicated maybe than any other agreement we have on trade, because, you know, we have natural conflict,” Trump said. “The problem we have is that they want a car company, and I want a car company… They want steel, and we want steel.”
Trump added that while other countries were “very far away,” Canada’s geographic closeness to the U.S. means they’re more likely to compete economically – but both want to avoid competing as much as possible.
“We don’t like to compete because we sort of hurt each other when we compete,” the president said.
Trump did indicate that there would be at least some tariffs in the final agreement between the U.S. and Canada, but that the U.S. would treat Canada “fairly” – likely meaning that he won’t allow the U.S. to be “ripped off” by Canadian trade policies but perhaps that America won’t demand exorbitant tariffs.
“We’re going to especially treat Canada fairly,” Trump said. “All we do now is fairness, but fairness leads us to the most successful country there’s ever been.”
Latest News Stories
WATCH: National Guard case before SCOTUS; Trump insists China soybean deal coming
Illinois quick hits: Harvey furloughs some employees; lead poisoning prevention continues
Illinois quick hits: Filings made to SCOTUS in National Guard case; Chicago sued DHS
Colorado Dems seek restoration of $600M in federal funds
Senate Democrats block bill to end government shutdown for 11th time
WATCH: Eric Trump talks about his book at Reagan Library
IL State rep: Grants are paying off in effort to combat auto thefts, carjackings
Illinois asks Supreme Court not to give Trump authority over National Guard
9th Circuit rules Trump can activate National Guard to protect ICE in Portland
WATCH: Pritzker not confident Trump can solve soybean trade deal with China
State senator points to failures as Illinois governor celebrates veterans home
Trump addresses Georgia’s years-long migrant farm worker concerns
Ongoing federal funding lapse now longest full government shutdown in history
Federal courts limit operations as funding lapse continues