Supreme Court rejects bid to overturn H-1B visa rule
The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday declined to hear a case challenging a rule that allows spouses of H-1B workers to work in the United States.
In the case, Save Jobs USA challenged a 2015 rule allowing spouses of H-1B workers to get H-4 visas. The rule was put in place by the Obama administration.
“Its definition contains no indication of work authorization, and for forty-five years the executive interpreted it as not permitting work,” a petition to the court reads.
The H-1B program allows businesses to petition for high-skilled foreign workers, typically with at least a bachelor’s degree, to work and live in the United States.
The visa is most often used by companies in the technology industry. In fiscal year 2025, Amazon, Meta and Apple were among the top petitioners for H-1B visas, according to data from the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services website.
The high court’s denial to hear arguments in the case comes as President Donald Trump imposed a $100,000 fee on businesses that apply for new H-1B workers. The fee has already been challenged by a group of several unions.
The Department of Homeland Security granted more than 25,000 H-4 visa petitions to spouses of H-1B workers in fiscal year 2024, according to department data.
The District of Columbia circuit court previously rejected Save Jobs USA’s petition to change the rule allowing spouses to work in the country.
“Since announcing its claim of having unlimited authority to permit alien employment, DHS has promulgated regulations authorizing several massive alien employment programs entirely through regulation,” Save Jobs USA’s petition reads.
The petition pointed to the optional practical training program, which allows immigrant students to remain in the country after graduating from a U.S. college or university and before obtaining work authorization through the H-1B program.
“As long as aliens can work in the United States, they can afford to remain in the United States,” the petition reads. “This regulatory transformation of parole has subjected small communities to a huge influx of aliens that the communities have to support with increases in services.”
Latest News Stories
SC weighs whether Amazon must pay workers for mandatory COVID screenings
WATCH: Tax increase talk at Statehouse; Bost’s election lawsuit against Illinois wins standing
Illinois Quick Hits: Indiana governor ‘working hard’ to attract Bears
Vance’s tie-breaking vote tanks resolution restricting Venezuela military actions
Federal court upholds California congressional redistricting
Trump orders new mediation for New York rail contract dispute
U.S. House passes two more govt funding bills, sending to Senate
Governors seek delay on sharing cost of food stamp errors
Supreme Court ruling allows Bost to challenge Illinois election law
Illinois quick hits: Illinois auto insurance rates dropping
SCOTUS rules on warrantless searches, double convictions and election suits
WATCH: WA Democrats criticize reporter probes into potential daycare fraud