Supreme Court to consider drug user gun possession case
The U.S. Supreme Court agreed on Monday to hear a case regarding whether regular drug users can possess firearms.
The case, United States v. Hemani, challenges whether federal statutes barring a person who “is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance” violates the Second Amendment.
The case centers on a Texas man who was charged with a felony when FBI agents found a pistol, marijuana and cocaine in his home after obtaining a search warrant, a petition to the court read.
The Trump administration petitioned the high court to hear the case after a lower court struck down the law barring people who use drugs such as marijuana from possessing firearms.
The Trump administration argued that regular drug users can simply stop their use to regain access to firearms under the law.
“By disqualifying only habitual users of illegal drugs from possessing firearms, the statute imposes a limited, inherently temporary restriction—one which the individual can remove at any time simply by ceasing his unlawful drug use,” the Trump administration’s petition reads.
Latest News Stories
Multiple people shot at Dallas ICE facility
Louisiana joins four states in complaint against electricity grid operator
Illinois quick hits: State rep. appointed circuit judge; Bailey to seek rematch with Pritzker
Heather Nohren Appointed Vice President for Student Services at Lake Land College
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Casey-Westfield School Board for September 15, 2025
Leavitt calls for firing UN staff if Trump’s escalator stopped intentionally
Figures show California is state with highest unemployment
Teacher union sues feds for delaying loan forgiveness
Catholic law professor says lower courts botched tariff rulings
Bipartisan lawmakers reintroduce DACA protections
Routh guilty on all charges in plot to kill Trump
Trump, Zelenskyy meet as Russia accused of violating NATO nations’ air space
WATCH: IL governor on photo with wanted suspect: ‘No way to vet everybody’
Illinois quick hits: Constitutional amendment would guarantee parental rights