Illinois approves $1.5B transit package, funding for long-delayed projects
(The Center Square) – Illinois lawmakers approved a $1.5 billion transit package, including long-delayed Moline-to-Chicago rail, hailed by Democrats as a ‘big win’ for the Quad Cities but criticized as an expensive burden on taxpayers.
Illinois U.S. Rep. Eric Sorensen, D-Moline, celebrated the development on social media, calling it “a ‘BFD’ for the Quad Cities.”
“We are closer than ever to having passenger trains between Moline and Chicago. Now, we will use these state funds, along with federal funds secured by former Congresswoman Cheri Bustos and me,” said Sorensen.
But state Sen. Don DeWitte, R-St. Charles, said the project remains in its early stages and warned that the costs and ridership projections are still unclear.
“There’s an awful lot of study that needs to go into determining what the real cost of this service is going to be to the taxpayers,” DeWitte told The Center Square. “Until they start looking at what the potential passenger flow might be, I don’t think they have any clue what this project is really going to cost.”
DeWitte, a member of the Senate Transportation Committee, also questioned the process behind the $1.5 billion package, which lawmakers passed in the early morning hours on Halloween.
“This was a major piece of legislation passed at 4 a.m.,” he said. “There’s a reason why these types of bills get run that early in the morning — because they don’t want anybody to see it.”
DeWitte described the legislation as a “Christmas tree bill,” where lawmakers attach local projects in exchange for votes to advance larger spending measures.
“The only way they are able to get support for significant funding proposals like this is by hanging their wish list items on the bill in exchange for votes,” DeWitte said. “There’s rail service to Moline, improvements to Willard Airport, subsidies for Springfield’s airport service, electric buses, bike paths—everyone is hanging ornaments on the tree.”
DeWitte highlighted the Elgin-to-Rockford rail extension as a cautionary tale. Despite state subsidies, some cities along the route opted out, reducing ridership and revenue.
“Now you have the largest city in McHenry County choosing not to participate in the Elgin-Rockford extension,” said DeWitte. “That removes a significant number of potential daily riders, which will impact the revenue stream and ultimately increase how much the state will need to subsidize the service. I can easily envision a similar scenario occurring on other proposed routes, whether it’s Chicago to Moline, Chicago to Peoria, or Peoria to the Quad Cities.”
According to DeWitte, many Illinois transit projects move forward without full studies on costs, potential riders, or city and county contributions.
“It’s a very expensive preliminary study process,” DeWitte said.
Beyond cost concerns, DeWitte emphasized the importance of fair representation for the suburban counties, known as the “collar counties,” which rely on transit services like the CTA and METRA.
“Now that this legislation has passed, I hope the process comes together so that both the city and the collar counties have equitable representation in how this significant new revenue stream is allocated and spent,” said DeWitte.
Latest News Stories
City Council Approves 4% Pay Increase for Appointed Officials
Illinois Quick Hits: Governor announces green tax credits for film and TV
‘Plaintiffs’ lawyer paradise:’ IL lawsuit-friendly courts jack up costs, report says
AG candidate seeks to reform SAFE-T Act
Op-Ed: Senate Bill 3070 provides sensible solution for students, manufacturers
Illinois millionaire’s tax moves closer to November ballot
Ava Goble’s Complete-Game Shutout Powers Casey-Westfield Past Richland County 8-0
Casey-Westfield Blanks Richland County 2-0 Behind Masterful One-Hit Shutout
U.S. Navy intercepts, seizes Iranian cargo ship
Everyday Economics: Retail sales and housing suggest a resilient consumer
Authorities: 8 children killed in domestic shootings in NW Louisiana
Reentry housing bill draws support from advocates; debate centers on cost, public safety