Supreme Court declines challenge to California’s congressional map
The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge to California’s redistricting bid that would add more Democrat-majority districts in the state.
In November, California voters approved Proposition 50, a ballot measure that allowed mid-decade congressional redistricting. The measure was proposed by the Democrat-led General Assembly to add as many as five congressional districts in favor of Democrats.
The California Legislature took up the effort after legislators in Texas redrew congressional maps to add as many as five districts in favor of Republicans. However, lawyers for the Trump administration urged justices on the Supreme Court to strike down California’s map.
The lawyers argued Prop. 50, the California ballot measure to approve the new congressional district lines, made distinctions on race and should be classified as racial gerrymandering. Prop. 50 passed with nearly 65% of the vote in the Nov. 4 general election.
“An injunction effectively requiring California to return to its earlier map would be less disruptive to the State’s election apparatus than allowing the Prop 50 map to go into effect,” the lawyers wrote.
“Under the proposed lines, Democrats could gain up to 5 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives,” California Democrats wrote. “With a majority in the House, Democrats can fight back against Trump and Republicans’ MAGA agenda.”
Latest News Stories
Op-Ed: Oversight faps in federal drug program put Illinois’ independent practices at risk
War of words reignites with Trump, Pritzker, Bailey
Judge won’t let ConAgra off hook in class action over fish fillet brine
Tuberville, Jones to face off in Alabama governor’s race
Congressional candidates discuss immigration, tax policies
Trump-endorsed Gallrein outs Massie in Kentucky
U.S. House defies Senate, weakens private equity restrictions in housing bill
Illinois Quick Hits: Group files lawsuit against gun owner ID law
Pritzker touts EV plant in Normal, Bailey says taxpayers bear the burden
State Supreme Court hears arguments over Uber forced arbitration
Vance defends DOJ’s nearly $1.8B ‘weaponization’ fund
Vance highlights ‘progress’ in Iran negotiations, floats additional fighting