Supreme Court declines challenge to California’s congressional map
The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge to California’s redistricting bid that would add more Democrat-majority districts in the state.
In November, California voters approved Proposition 50, a ballot measure that allowed mid-decade congressional redistricting. The measure was proposed by the Democrat-led General Assembly to add as many as five congressional districts in favor of Democrats.
The California Legislature took up the effort after legislators in Texas redrew congressional maps to add as many as five districts in favor of Republicans. However, lawyers for the Trump administration urged justices on the Supreme Court to strike down California’s map.
The lawyers argued Prop. 50, the California ballot measure to approve the new congressional district lines, made distinctions on race and should be classified as racial gerrymandering. Prop. 50 passed with nearly 65% of the vote in the Nov. 4 general election.
“An injunction effectively requiring California to return to its earlier map would be less disruptive to the State’s election apparatus than allowing the Prop 50 map to go into effect,” the lawyers wrote.
“Under the proposed lines, Democrats could gain up to 5 seats in the U.S. House of Representatives,” California Democrats wrote. “With a majority in the House, Democrats can fight back against Trump and Republicans’ MAGA agenda.”
Latest News Stories
Soaring costs and short supply shut millennials out of housing market
Vought testifies before lawmakers on Trump’s $2.1T budget request
SNAP eligibility changes spark debate on gap for impacted recipients
Trump puts spotlight on China, Iran’s top oil consumer
Lawmakers, auditors offer fraud prevention solutions
Illinois unions seek to kill Waymo-friendly bill in Springfield
Rich States Poor States: Tax policy largely determines states’ economic competitiveness
78 pro-life orgs ask DOJ to stop undermining state laws by favoring aborting drug industry
Illinois Quick Hits: Two of ComEd four released; new trial expected
Casey-Westfield Launches Seven Home Runs in 18-4 Rout of Tri-County
Meeting Summary and Briefs: Casey City Council for April 6, 2026
Chicago suit vs oil cos. may yet survive SCOTUS ruling, judge hints